[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))

Subject: Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
From: "keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:40:24 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct
References: <dX9M5.16304$e5.38932@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3a014f8f@news.iprimus.com.au> <3A0157D9.9ACD37FD@ozemail.com.au> <3A04F191.B400E461@ozemail.com.au> <3A04F9BB.8C0878FC@ozemail.com.au> <S6rN5.127726$bI6.4944004@news1.giganews.com> <3A06720C.6DA6B7B4@ozemail.com.au> <YbvN5.76845$YX4.2358309@news2.giganews.com> <3A068791.14C636D7@ozemail.com.au> <3KMN5.130249$bI6.5092427@news1.giganews.com> <3A07A0E9.F247AFC4@ozemail.com.au> <BsNN5.130292$bI6.5096698@news1.giganews.com> <8FE5CBE32gunzelT333@203.164.20.149> <u2PN5.78346$YX4.2447278@news2.giganews.com> <8FE5CE782gunzelT333@203.164.20.149> <4lPN5.130396$bI6.5108130@news1.giganews.com> <3A080ED2.A666736@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au> <8FE6E1C82gunzelT333@203.164.20.149> <3a094fe8$0$19419$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a09d691$0$19413$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <qNkO5.82171$YX4.2566229@news2.giganews.com> <3a09df2b$0$19418$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:23944


Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
3a09df2b$0$19418$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a09df2b$0$19418$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Dave Proctor"
> > "sean"
> > > Why the <beep> would CityRail want DOO? with the instants of
> > bushing/mugings on trains?
> >
> > The current crop of guards don't get out of their little cubbie-hole
anyway,
> > so a fat lot of good they are.
>
>
> They're not required to. It's the lazy Chubbies who are responsible for
most
> of the inaction on assaults.
>

Go and read SWU 141 pages 5 and 6, its the unit outlining basic duties of
train crews. Including patroling the train and looking after passengers.

Dave Malcolm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

References:
- [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "David Lindstrom" <D_Lindstrom@Bigpond.com>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "Alan Shaw" <brindabella@primus.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael Kurkowski)
- Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image)
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael Kurkowski)
- Re: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image)
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>
- Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael Kurkowski)
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "sean" <sean@hello.springwood.rail>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Airport rail link
Next by Date: Re: Safety first in rail system's radical revamp
Prev by thread: Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
Next by thread: Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread