Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

"keith malcolm"
> > Tezza
> > "Dave Proctor"
> > > "sean"
> > > > Why the <beep> would CityRail want DOO? with the instants of
> > > bushing/mugings on trains?
> > >
> > > The current crop of guards don't get out of their little cubbie-hole
> anyway, so a fat lot of good they are.
> >
> >
> > They're not required to. It's the lazy Chubbies who are responsible for
> most of the inaction on assaults.
> >
>
> Go and read SWU 141 pages 5 and 6, its the unit outlining basic duties of
> train crews. Including patroling the train and looking after passengers.

"patrol the train as required.........". As I said, they're not required to.
Management don't want to be held liable for sheila guards being bashed or
raped.