Re: Why keep Clyde?

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

<thebaron@nospam.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:8udbjf$1fvp$1@pc1762.alcatel.com.au...
> Build a new platform on the northern side. From memory theres room.
> Correct me if i'm wrong.

Bad memory, the northern side of platform 1 is a few feet off Church St? So
you want them to spend a millions for a few dozen/hundred passengers who
already have a platform?

>
> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
>
> > "Peter Degotardi"
> >> Having spent a lot of time standing on Granville station over the
> >> last few weeks (Olympic Park, chg Lidcombe, chg Granville
> >> for Windsor), it seems a bit bizarre to have 2 stations so close
> >> together (how far apart are Granville/Clyde btw? )
> >>
> >> How about boning Clyde and making Lidcombe the interchange
> >> station for the Carlingford line ? That way you have an interchange
> >> for InnerWest, Western, South, Carlingford and Olympic Park in
> >> one location.
>
> > And which platform at Lidcombe would you block for the Carlo trains to sit
on?
>
>