[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why keep Clyde?

Subject: Re: Why keep Clyde?
From: "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 19:14:51 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: The Internet Group (Sydney)
References: <3A09EAF2.2F7C7EB1@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com> <3a09f794$0$19429$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8udbjf$1fvp$1@pc1762.alcatel.com.au> <3a0a3675$0$19425$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:23958

> Bad memory, the northern side of platform 1 is a few feet off Church St?
So
> you want them to spend a millions for a few dozen/hundred passengers who
> already have a platform?

Why not.. Carlingford - all to OLP around and back to Carlingford?

That way, you remove the Olympic Sprint train (that runs with the capacity
of a Carlingford train) and turn 2 shuttles into one. And you don't have to
block the main line at Lidcombe. (Wait time at Carlingford.)

Or would that be sensible..

Much more exciting as a driver to do a big OLP loop than that silly little
slingshot run they do now...

Just a thought.

Tony.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NSW] Olympic Sprint (was Why keep Clyde?)
  - From: "Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Peter Ware <pwware@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Peter Degotardi <peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Airport rail link
Next by Date: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Prev by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Next by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread