[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why keep Clyde?
- Subject: Why keep Clyde?
- From: Peter Degotardi <peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:08:19 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: IBM Global Services Australia
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:22861
Having spent a lot of time standing on Granville station over the
last few weeks (Olympic Park, chg Lidcombe, chg Granville
for Windsor), it seems a bit bizarre to have 2 stations so close
together (how far apart are Granville/Clyde btw? )
How about boning Clyde and making Lidcombe the interchange
station for the Carlingford line ? That way you have an interchange
for InnerWest, Western, South, Carlingford and Olympic Park in
one location.
(How I hated the fact the trains to/from Windsor may or may not stop
at Lidcombe)
--
Peter Degotardi
LAN Engineer
IBM Olympic Program Office
IBM Global Services Australia
email peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com "I speak from IBM not *for* IBM"
(Remove the dontspamme. to email me)