Re: Mark's Marvellous Map of Bendigo?

["Graeme Sproul" <sproul@dcsi.net.au>]

> a Jack of all Trades who knows everything, but can do only one or two
> things
> > properly, the rest poorly.
>
?????? What are you trying to say.
I thought the whole object of "multi skilling" was to empower employees to
enjoy there work more,make them leaner and keener,and make the boss richer.
Cheers
Graeme
Notagunzel <notagunzel@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
FRdP2.80$rq6.1145@nswpull.telstra.net">news:FRdP2.80$rq6.1145@nswpull.telstra.net...
> Rod <berlina@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> zb1P2.4454$MB3.7440@newsfeeds.bigpond.com">news:zb1P2.4454$MB3.7440@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>
> >              Under the proposed rules, on arrival at the up home, the
> > qualified man will operate the points in a similar way as Wangaratta.
But
> at
> > the Melbourne end, he will need to operate the Benalla signal box to get
> > across the road xing, out on to the bridge and back into the shed and
> > reverse to get back on his train.
> > Even if they close the box and remove/replace the point rodding, will
> cause
> > a serious delay to the running of this train. This train runs non-time
> > sensitive goods at the moment. New Owners will need to concentrate on
> > all Freight available, if they are to increase loadings in the N.East.
> > Trucks will run rings around us if we do not concentrate on lifting our
> > game, but decide to sack all the experts we have left and replace them
> with
> > a Jack of all Trades who knows everything, but can do only one or two
> things
> > properly, the rest poorly.
>
> The story I was told is that when Benalla was 'rationalised', the reason
> only one box was abolished was a severe shortage of capital funds, and if
> any further funding appears, Benalla A gets the chop as well.  When you
> think about it, Benalla A is the more expensive box to abolish, because of
> the level crossing.
>
> B.
>
>