Re: Signaller causes SPAD

[antstig@my-deja.com]

In article <8qeek1$11613@inetbws1.citec.com.au>,
  "Peter Dwyer" <peter.dwyer@qr.com.au> wrote:
>
> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> 39cab29c$0$26525$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:39cab29c$0$26525$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
>
> > Management then made a change to Safeworking that Drivers had to
obey
> > Controllers - they removed the phrase that said unless it
contravened
> > Safeworking or it wasn't safe to carry out the order. So once again,
> > management put ontime running ahead of safety. The Union put a ban
on that
> > amendment.
>
> Good thing about our safety policy, it wouldn't force us into that
> situation.

Do you mean that your safety policy is what CitRail want or is your
safety policy one where a driver disobeys an illegal/unsafe instruction?

Regards

Frank


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.