Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image

[James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>]

Dave Proctor wrote:
> 
> And that is a cop-out. If I click on a link in a site that is (allegedly)
> designed for 800x600, I expect any image that loads (if it is a jpg or gif,
> rather than htm or html file) to appear on the screen, unless it is stated
> it is a zip file which will download (for later unpacking).
> 
> Basically, your site is not 800x600 friendly, no mater how much you say it
> is.
>

If the image was displayed in a HTML document, then the page would be
greater than 800x600. However, when you download an image, there is no
formatting information. All you are getting is the raw image, not a HTML
document. As have said twice now, I am trialing a new method for
displaying the photos which is 800x600 friendly.

-- 
- James Brook -

----------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail:     
mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
Victorian Railfan Web Site:    
http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
----------------------------------------------------------------