Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

"James Brook" <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
3A07CC20.3B5DD39F@ozemail.com.au">news:3A07CC20.3B5DD39F@ozemail.com.au...
> Dave Proctor wrote:
> >
> > And that is a cop-out. If I click on a link in a site that is
(allegedly)
> > designed for 800x600, I expect any image that loads (if it is a jpg or
gif,
> > rather than htm or html file) to appear on the screen, unless it is
stated
> > it is a zip file which will download (for later unpacking).
> >
> > Basically, your site is not 800x600 friendly, no mater how much you say
it
> > is.
> >
>
> If the image was displayed in a HTML document, then the page would be
> greater than 800x600. However, when you download an image, there is no
> formatting information. All you are getting is the raw image, not a HTML
> document. As have said twice now, I am trialing a new method for
> displaying the photos which is 800x600 friendly.

Thus making your site 800x600 ready. Until all documents (HTML, jpeg,
whatever) are 800x600 friendly, your site is not 800x600 friendly.

Dave