Re: DSRM is ....

[robson <robson@cia.com.au>]

Trevor Edmonds wrote:
> 
> If you are not happy with this arrangement, I suggest you lobby our
> potential benefactors to ensure that any further assistance they 
> may provide to us meets the terms of your agenda.



That was not the point. You said and I quote again .... "If you are not
a member you do not get a say in how we spend our time and money". I am
saying that if public money is spent on DSRM then the public is entitled
to have a say, whether it is in an open forum like aus.rail, in a letter
to the editor of a newspaper, or to any other public forum they so wish.
Whether DSRM wishes to take notice is up to it.