Re: Tempe - Incorrect Signage?

["Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>]

Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
3a7ebd97$0$16399$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a7ebd97$0$16399$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Chris Downs" .
> | Tezza
> | > "Optus"
> | > | The 5:08pm from
> | > | Central to East Hills never arrives at East Hills less than 5 mins
> late.
> | > | There are normally no delays along the track on this service yet it
> can
> | > | never run close to timetable.
> | >
> | > It is generally caused by the all stations Bankers in front of it. They
> | > delay most East Hills services, which then delay most Campbelltown
> trains.
> | > I've never been able to work out why the Bankers run late though, they
> have
> | > plenty of catch-up time.
> |
> | And all too often the down "Banker" runs late because it is held on the
> rise
> | to the South West Ocean Outfall between Wolli Creek and Turrella awaiting
> the
> | passage of the overtaking Campbelltown/Macarthur service.
>
> If a Banker gets that far, I'm not surprised it's held up - the idiot
> signaller would be trying to work out how the hell to sort out the mess he's
> caused.

Which timetable is the 5:08pm Central to East Hills service in - a revised
WTT?  The public timetable shows the 5:08pm ex Central as a Campbelltown via
Tempe service, no wonder you lost me.  Is it drugs, signallers or inaccurate
info in the public domain this time?

Chris