[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Victorian sg conversion

Subject: Re: Victorian sg conversion
From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 04:52:14 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: bleah
References: <39E6F1D1.5CB07883@werple.net.au> <3GMF5.5848$wG1.19074@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <39E7D1E3.5C42AC52@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au> <p4QF5.6$DL4.2991@vic.nntp.telstra.net> <39eb1d3f.0@news1.mweb.co.za> <nZLG5.41$dh3.3507@news0.optus.net.au> <39EBDD2D.4888666C@ozemail.com.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/03.08.04
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:21905

James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au> wrote in article
<39EBDD2D.4888666C@ozemail.com.au>: 

>And where would Steamrail get an N from? The only one left is in the
>museum and I don't think it should be touched. If it is "restored" we
>will no longer have a VR N class locomotive as it will have to be
>modified for modern operational conditions. What is needed is a proper
>museum so these rare locomotives can be preserved properly.

I'm sure they would lovingly preserve it up at Dorrigo, like all the others 
they have lovingly preserved.

M.

-- 
(To email me just remove ".spam" off my email address).

Whip me, Beat me, just don't Windows ME

References:
- Victorian sg conversion
  - From: Roderick Smith <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: Victorian sg conversion
  - From: "Samuel Eades" <seades@bigpond.net.au>
- Re: Victorian sg conversion
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>
- Re: Victorian sg conversion
  - From: "Paul Hambleton" <P.Hambleton@bom.gov.au>
- Re: Victorian sg conversion
  - From: "steamfreak" <steamfreak711@yahoo.com>
- Re: Victorian sg conversion
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Victorian sg conversion
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Redundancy @ FreightCorp?
Next by Date: Re: Sites
Prev by thread: Re: Victorian sg conversion
Next by thread: Re: Victorian sg conversion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread