Re: [NSW] Post Olympics

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

"Luke" <lobi1_800@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
8rjsig$2h9$1@gruvel.une.edu.au">news:8rjsig$2h9$1@gruvel.une.edu.au...
> Look buddy,
>
> The original post asked for a reference to a road rule
> requiring a pedestrian to keep left, and I gave it.  Nothing
> more, noting less.  If you don't like to be made to look
> like and idiot, I suggest you actually research your claims
> before you make them.

And you are the one that is being made to look like an idiot. The blanket
claim was that pedestrians have to keep to the left - you gave a reference
to the ARR that only partly addressed the blanket claim, without mentioning,
in any way, the limitations of that reference. Particularly since the ARR
you gave also said that pedestrians can keep to the right, as applicable.
Your reference was therefore flawed. If it only applied to pedestrians using
the road, you should have said so. You didn't.

Dave


> "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in
> message teeD5.8311$Ly1.93512@news5.giganews.com">news:teeD5.8311$Ly1.93512@news5.giganews.com...
> > "Luke" <lobi1_800@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> > 8rjqje$3b9$1@gruvel.une.edu.au">news:8rjqje$3b9$1@gruvel.une.edu.au...
> > > In your original post to aus.legal you didn't mention a
> > > footpath.  FYI, the road includes the shoulders which,
> in an
> > > undeveloped area can include the equivalent of a
> footpath.
> >
> > And nobody mentioned that the pedestrian in question was
> walking on the road
> > either, you merely assumed it.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
>
>