Re: [NSW] Post Olympics

["Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>]

Dave Proctor <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in
message EPeD5.8967$bI6.422080@news1.giganews.com">news:EPeD5.8967$bI6.422080@news1.giganews.com...
> Luke <lobi1_800@yahoo.com.au> wrote

>> Look buddy,

>> The original post asked for a reference to a road
>> rule requiring a pedestrian to keep left, and I gave
>> it.  Nothing more, noting less.  If you don't like to be
>> made to look like and idiot, I suggest you actually
>> research your claims before you make them.

> And you are the one that is being made to look like an idiot.

Fraid not. You really should read up on the rule of holes.

He's got you by the short and curlys and you'll never
bullshit your way out of your predicament now.

> The blanket claim was that pedestrians have to keep to the left - you
> gave a reference to the ARR that only partly addressed the blanket
> claim, without mentioning, in any way, the limitations of that reference.
> Particularly since the ARR you gave also said that pedestrians can
> keep to the right, as applicable. Your reference was therefore flawed.
> If it only applied to pedestrians using the road, you should have said so.
> You didn't.

Pathetic really. Even you should be able to bullshit better than that.

> > "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in
> > message teeD5.8311$Ly1.93512@news5.giganews.com">news:teeD5.8311$Ly1.93512@news5.giganews.com...
> > > "Luke" <lobi1_800@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> > > 8rjqje$3b9$1@gruvel.une.edu.au">news:8rjqje$3b9$1@gruvel.une.edu.au...
> > > > In your original post to aus.legal you didn't mention a
> > > > footpath.  FYI, the road includes the shoulders which,
> > in an
> > > > undeveloped area can include the equivalent of a
> > footpath.
> > >
> > > And nobody mentioned that the pedestrian in question was
> > walking on the road
> > > either, you merely assumed it.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>