[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Diesel loco motors

Subject: Re: Diesel loco motors
From: James Robinson <Wascana@my-deja.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 22:39:39 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.railroad,aus.rail
Organization: Disorganized
References: <EOM15.84$i52.7035007@news.interact.net.au><8i87s5$cg9$1@bob.news.rcn.net> <B56D060E.10F27%markbau@altavista.com> <8i8q55$o2e$1@news3.infoave.net> <39483467.CB97D612@alphalink.com.au> <8ifpvr$s70$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <iinnkssknhv7n267s1drqc4anb3b9q64kq@4ax.com> <8iieus$8ad$1@news3.infoave.net> <394D4267.F03972E4@isp800.com>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12584

Kenneth Rickman wrote:

> The SD90MAC-H is also the first locomotive in this counrty, AFAIK,
> which has anti-freeze in the radiatior.

The rebuilt locomotives with Caterpillar engines could use antifreeze.

References:
- Diesel loco motors
  - From: "Mark" <mra@iaa.com.au>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: "asterix" <asterix@mail1.nai.net>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: Mark Bau <markbau@altavista.com>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: "John Garrison" <corrjng@rbnet.com>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: Reece Isaac <throttle@alphalink.com.au>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: "John Black" <mm6fan@mindspring.com>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: Andrew Price <aprice@mail.dotcom.fr>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: "John Garrison" <corrjng@rbnet.com>
- Re: Diesel loco motors
  - From: Kenneth Rickman <drickman@isp800.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Mel] Derail caused by vandals
Next by Date: Difference between CLF & CLP loco's?
Prev by thread: Re: Diesel loco motors
Next by thread: Re: Diesel loco motors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread