Re: Drivers and guards to be sacked.

[L & D <daisyw@ozemail.com.au>]

Dave Proctor wrote:

> "L & D" <daisyw@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> 399FD6B9.E5983223@ozemail.com.au">news:399FD6B9.E5983223@ozemail.com.au...
> >
> > Dave Proctor wrote:
> >
> > > "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au> wrote in message
> > > 8nog68$oeg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au">news:8nog68$oeg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au...
> > > > >
> > > > > Guards not wearing ties and Drivers with wrong shoes is not costing
> > > > > CityDerail any business. Failing to adequately train new Drivers
> most
> > > > > assuredly is.
> > > >
> > > > Convenient interupting of my paragraphs. Well done.
> > > >
> > > > Lets see how much incompetence is left after October 1.
> > >
> > > I presume this was from Tezza?
> > >
> > > Guards not wearing ties contributes to an image of slovenliness and
> > > incompetence, thus driving people from the railways into their cars
> >
> > CRAP
>
> No it isn't - I now of two people who have said that they prefer not to
> travel by train because the staff look like slobs, and if they aren't
> prepared to look after their personal appearance, how can they be expected
> to look after other peoples safety? For myself, I look after my own
> appearance first (before I leave home) and then go from there. Someone who
> is lacksadaisical in their own personal appearance will be lacksadaiscial in
> most things.

Personnel appearance for a lot of workers in the same industries are different
all around Australia in all walks of life so how can you make a statement like
that? It might be all well for you, because you  may have time to look after
your appearance before leaving home but not every body has the time available to
them all the time.


>
>
> > > (thus
> > > reducing fare revenue and increasing taxpayer subsidy). Drivers with
> wrong
> > > shoes incurs WorkCover fines as well as increased premiums due to
> increased
> > > claims from workplace injuries - increased premiums and fines results in
> > > higher costs and thus, increased taxpayer subsidy.
> > >
> > > So why is Tezza complaining? He is, after all, concerned about taxpayer
> > > dollars being spent on appeals over unfair dismissal - if he is so
> > > concerned, why isn't he concerned about these matters?
>
> Notice you did not address this point.

Why should I
Davo


>
>
> Dave