Re: Drivers and guards to be sacked.

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

"L & D" <daisyw@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
399FD6B9.E5983223@ozemail.com.au">news:399FD6B9.E5983223@ozemail.com.au...
>
> Dave Proctor wrote:
>
> > "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au> wrote in message
> > 8nog68$oeg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au">news:8nog68$oeg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au...
> > > >
> > > > Guards not wearing ties and Drivers with wrong shoes is not costing
> > > > CityDerail any business. Failing to adequately train new Drivers
most
> > > > assuredly is.
> > >
> > > Convenient interupting of my paragraphs. Well done.
> > >
> > > Lets see how much incompetence is left after October 1.
> >
> > I presume this was from Tezza?
> >
> > Guards not wearing ties contributes to an image of slovenliness and
> > incompetence, thus driving people from the railways into their cars
>
> CRAP

No it isn't - I now of two people who have said that they prefer not to
travel by train because the staff look like slobs, and if they aren't
prepared to look after their personal appearance, how can they be expected
to look after other peoples safety? For myself, I look after my own
appearance first (before I leave home) and then go from there. Someone who
is lacksadaisical in their own personal appearance will be lacksadaiscial in
most things.

> > (thus
> > reducing fare revenue and increasing taxpayer subsidy). Drivers with
wrong
> > shoes incurs WorkCover fines as well as increased premiums due to
increased
> > claims from workplace injuries - increased premiums and fines results in
> > higher costs and thus, increased taxpayer subsidy.
> >
> > So why is Tezza complaining? He is, after all, concerned about taxpayer
> > dollars being spent on appeals over unfair dismissal - if he is so
> > concerned, why isn't he concerned about these matters?

Notice you did not address this point.

Dave