[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Railcar shell in Canberra

Subject: Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
From: John Dennis <jdennis@acslink.net.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 17:20:30 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
Organization: Optus Internet
References: <iJBH3.38$il4.418684@news0.optus.net.au> <7smt5o$aos$1@mirv.unsw.edu.au> <7snnn1$7v6$2@toto.tig.com.au> <01bf094c$71badf60$142e11cb@rodsmith>

On 28 Sep 1999 01:23:38 GMT, "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
wrote:

>When AUPT was displayed in Melbourne, it had the destination 'Kingston':
>not a Melbourne or Sydney destination; the one in SA would not need urban
>service.  However, that is exactly where the vehicle did end.

Which of the Kingston's in SA do not need urban service?  <G>

Cheers...JD

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>

References:
- Railcar shell in Canberra
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
  - From: G.Lambert@unsw.edu.au (Geoff Lambert)
- Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
  - From: ROY HOWARTH <rhowarth@ihug.com.au>
- Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: How can we make trains run later?
Next by Date: Re: BK cars
Prev by thread: Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
Next by thread: Re: Railcar shell in Canberra
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread