[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tangaras are crap

Subject: Re: Tangaras are crap
From: Railway Rasputin <bob@fastlink.com.au>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 20:21:03 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Optus Internet
References: <B44C8FCB.4E9%joel@abilitycorp.com.au> <80snj2$1kn1@xlprod01.westpac.com.au> <8llY3.21276$we.35176@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <80vafd$su1$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <4sJY3.4461$MZ.36043@ozemail.com.au> <3833ba95@vk4lw.caboolture.net.au>



Thomas Fothergill wrote:
> 
>
> ahem..*cough* ..
> debatable.. i think QR's new 220series SMUs look much sexier :)
> 
> tom.

I'm still at a loss to see how a box on wheels (Tangara) looks good.

rgds

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Thomas Fothergill" <s370507@student.uq.edu.au>

References:
- Tangaras
  - From: Joel Cooper <joel@abilitycorp.com.au>
- Tangaras are crap
  - From: "David" <drhilder@hotmail.com (nospamjunk)>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Dean Stalker" <dstalker2000@hotmail.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Garry Hoddinett" <hoddos@netspace.net.au>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Thomas Fothergill" <s370507@student.uq.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Peterbrough Station news thur18 th nov 1999.
Next by Date: Re: anyone?
Prev by thread: Re: Tangaras are crap
Next by thread: Re: Tangaras are crap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread