[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tangaras are crap

Subject: Re: Tangaras are crap
From: "Thomas Fothergill" <s370507@student.uq.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:37:47 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <B44C8FCB.4E9%joel@abilitycorp.com.au> <80snj2$1kn1@xlprod01.westpac.com.au> <8llY3.21276$we.35176@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <80vafd$su1$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <4sJY3.4461$MZ.36043@ozemail.com.au>


Garry Hoddinett <hoddos@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
4sJY3.4461$MZ.36043@ozemail.com.au">news:4sJY3.4461$MZ.36043@ozemail.com.au...
<snip>
> so.  When Tangaras were introduced  they portrayed a modern clean image
for
> CityRail which helped in its marketing - they still look the flashiest of
> all Australia's suburban trains.

ahem..*cough* ..
debatable.. i think QR's new 220series SMUs look much sexier :)

tom.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: keithm@commslab.gov.au (Dave Malcolm)
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: keithm@commslab.gov.au (Dave Malcolm)
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Jonathan Boles" <mousewithglasses@hotmail.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: Railway Rasputin <bob@fastlink.com.au>

References:
- Tangaras
  - From: Joel Cooper <joel@abilitycorp.com.au>
- Tangaras are crap
  - From: "David" <drhilder@hotmail.com (nospamjunk)>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Dean Stalker" <dstalker2000@hotmail.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Garry Hoddinett" <hoddos@netspace.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Victorian Closure Rumours
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] POTS (Position of Trains System)
Prev by thread: Re: Tangaras are crap
Next by thread: Re: Tangaras are crap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread