Re: Feedback needed

["Andrew" <atailby@mpx.com.au>]

but thats not how they like to do buseness these day they only have one
thing in mind and that is how to make a profit
Glenn at TIG <grjb@ihug.com.au> wrote in message
381E92C7.D2573B60@ihug.com.au">news:381E92C7.D2573B60@ihug.com.au...
>
>
> Dave Proctor wrote:
>
> >
> > Ridiculous? There are direct connections between the daylight
Melbournes,
> > and the overnight Murwillumbahs.
> >
>
> Well, yes, I suppose the connection would be "guaranteed" because ST-4
Melbourne
> Daylight
> forms NT-3 Murwillumbah Overnight. Its good to see that the timetable is
> operationally convenient and not passenger oriented. Passengers tend to
have an
> aversion to departing stations late at night. You are following in the
railways
> footsteps David! Remember ST16 on its final timetable because ST-4 was
> introduced? 0600 ex Albury! And why? Because it had to go to Meeks Road
for a
> service before forming NT-1 at 1624. And why does NT-1 leave before 16:30?
So it
> can get back to Sydney the following night at a respectable hour.
>
> Timetables should be written with the passengers interest in mind, and not
> because it conveniently fits together operationally.
>
> > ----
>
> Glenn
>
>