[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LA Rail Revival

Subject: Re: LA Rail Revival
From: elson@westworld.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:28:56 GMT
Newsgroups: uk.railway, aus.rail, la.transportation
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
References: <3762eb29.0@newshost.pcug.org.au> <37641dec.1427646@news.u-net.com> <3764321a.0@newshost.pcug.org.au> <CB_83.15325$AB2.307795@wbnws01.ne.mediaone.net> <7k29b2$hk1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <VA.000000c0.009b6fdc@default> <7k3q80$3fn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7k42ea$6gg$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7k4ba3$8cg@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>

In article <7k4ba3$8cg@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,
  "Tom Wetzel" <tlwetzel@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> This is irrelevant. If they ran LRTs in the New York subway (as is
> technically feasible), would that make it light rail?

> Whether I'm a "fan" of the Green Line is irrelevant.

Your opinion is irrelevant. The truth is, the Green Line is light rail.
End of story.

E

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: "Tom Wetzel" <tlwetzel@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- LA Rail Revival
  - From: "David Bennetts" <davibenn@pcug.org.au>
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: postmaster@spaceman001.u-net.com (Dave Sallery)
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: "David Bennetts" <davibenn@pcug.org.au>
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: "Jeff B. Kurland" <kurlandj@erols.com>
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: elson@westworld.com
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: Mike Newman <mike@gtnorthern.demon.co.uk>
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: tomwetzel@my-deja.com
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: elson@westworld.com
- Re: LA Rail Revival
  - From: "Tom Wetzel" <tlwetzel@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 422 rumours
Next by Date: Re: GUNZEL
Prev by thread: Re: LA Rail Revival
Next by thread: Re: LA Rail Revival
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread