Re: Sydney Light Rail Fails New Years Eve Challenge

[billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)]

rffergus@socs.uts.edu.au wrote:

> The reason why SLRC insisted that both extensions were to be built as an 'all
> or nothing' package was because they weren't relying on taxpayer assistance,
> and felt the CBD extension necessary in order to attract an appropriate
> ridership.

Just because you keep saying it over and over again doesn't make it
so.  "Ambit claim" offers that lack any real detail and are never
intended to be commercially tested mean nothing.  

> Yes, they certainly can. Spare copies can be found cut up into small sheets
> within arms reach of Carl Scully's ministerial toilet, along with the PTAC's
> Light Rail Strategic Plan.

The paucity of your position is clear.

Bill