[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Second rate Melbourne stations

Subject: Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
From: manwithnohat@bigpond.nukespamhere.com
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:40:01 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Completely Disorganized
References: <7g1dad$vr4$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g1f68$nhb$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <7g1h6u$3n7$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <37256D90.23B99B07@melbpc.org.au> <925346916.257948@tulla.netstra.com.au> <37284e98.463412@news.bigpond.com>

manwithnohat@bigpond.nukespamhere.com drunkenly burbled in a
corner of their mind:

>mk@netstra.com.au (Michael Kurkowski) drunkenly burbled in a
>corner of their mind:

>{SNIP]

>Lyndhurst (b/w Cranbourne-Dandenong) is one. Baxter (Stony
>Point-Frankston) would be another. Both of these stations
>would not have seen Electric services.
<Brain=On>
Of course, what I meant to say was Langwarrin, not Baxter.
</Brain=Normal>
>Narre Warren was recently (2/3 years?) closed/demolished
>yada yada
Brendan Searle

>(drew_carey at a bad hair day for bigpond.com)

References:
- Second rate Melbourne stations
  - From: count_chivas@my-dejanews.com
- Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
  - From: "Johann Fan" <yagsX@geocities.com>
- Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
  - From: cmgord@ecr.mu.oz.au (Christopher_Martin GORDON)
- Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
  - From: Jennifer Richmond <richmond@melbpc.org.au>
- Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
  - From: mk@netstra.com.au (Michael Kurkowski)
- Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
  - From: manwithnohat@bigpond.nukespamhere.com

Prev by Date: Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
Next by Date: Re: Melbourne - improved train/tram services
Prev by thread: Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
Next by thread: Re: Second rate Melbourne stations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread