[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More CityRail trouble ....

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: More CityRail trouble ....
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 21:18:44 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <6kkvqf$f5d$1@clarion.carno.net.au> <356e86e7.0@139.134.5.33> <356ECF36.48BC73E1@tig.com.au> <356f239f.0@139.134.5.33> <35749b08.3985354@news.syd.a2.com.au> <35767a17.12792335@news.ihug.co.nz> <3579c63f.3052085@news.syd.a2.com.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

paul wrote:

> Even when they used to run 2 car T sets a few years ago, they were
> scrapped due to poor reliability (one compressor or generator, no
> back-up if it fails). As they stand, Tangaras cannot run with fewer
> than 4 cars. S type cars would need 2 motor cars to ensure
> reliability.

So why do they only need one motor car on 2 car K and V sets then?

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

References:
- Re: More CityRail trouble ....
  - From: "DJ NightShade" <dj_nightshade@geocities.com>
- Re: More CityRail trouble ....
  - From: Michael Kurkowski <simcard@tig.com.au>
- Re: More CityRail trouble ....
  - From: "Ben Staples" <BenKim@bigpond.com>
- Re: More CityRail trouble ....
  - From: paulrw@xa2.com.au (paul)
- Re: More CityRail trouble ....
  - From: alberta@zip.com.au (Albert Alcoceba)
- Re: More CityRail trouble ....
  - From: paulrw@xa2.com.au (paul)

Prev by Date: Re: Implications of ICE crash
Next by Date: Re: 6 car Red Rattler
Prev by thread: Re: More CityRail trouble ....
Next by thread: Re: More CityRail trouble ....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread