[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TALGO tilt trains

Subject: Re: TALGO tilt trains
From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 12:06:02 +0800
Newsgroups: aus.rail, misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
References: <74n787$63e$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3676483a.0@news.highway1.com.au> <756sab$ahp$1@metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au> <36790be8.0@news.highway1.com.au> <75burd$rom$1@metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au>
Reply-To: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@nospam-icenet.com.au>

Matthew - I have freight in focus, and yes 1067 <-> 1435mm.

Maybe I should post also on the Euro rail NGs to see if its been tested
1000mm-1435mm-1676mm.

BTW 1676mm-1435mm = 241mm difference
BUT  1435mm-1067mm = 368mm difference

The difference is about 50% greater than that presently negotiated. This
does not seem to me to be insurmountable.

But I am looking for engineering input - is this something to raise around
the traps?

DW

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: tk2@Rcs1.urz.tu-dresden.de
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: "Matthew Smith" <matticue@corplink.com.au>
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: krel4203@netconnect.com.au (Krel )

References:
- QR new tilt train, eat your heart out interstate!
  - From: thalytgv@my-dejanews.com
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: matthew@mail.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier)
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
- Re: TALGO tilt trains
  - From: matthew@mail.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier)

Prev by Date: Re: TALGO tilt trains
Next by Date: Re: Position Vacant - Any Takers?
Prev by thread: Re: TALGO tilt trains
Next by thread: Re: TALGO tilt trains
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread