[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash

Subject: Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:16:25 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <izuc6.86412$xW4.664684@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <Zvuc6.47$mN6.3129@news0.optus.net.au> <kpzc6.87130$xW4.668502@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <950hp9$7k5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a75ffb8$0$16378$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:29961


"Alex Pout" <alpout@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
3a75ffb8$0$16378$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a75ffb8$0$16378$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
| Patrick <patrick@trafficgiant.net> wrote in message

| > Just how thick are these people?
|
|
| Pretty thick.  When I'm driving around the countryside, I can tell whether
a
| train line is in use by
| A) Grass growing through the tracks
| B) Rust on the top of rails.. shiny rails = used line.

Or rust = newly laid rail.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)

References:
- [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
  - From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au>
- Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
  - From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au>
- Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
  - From: Patrick <patrick@trafficgiant.net>
- Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
  - From: "Alex Pout" <alpout@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Beating the Odds (was: 5 Dead in XPT accident)
Next by Date: Re: (NSW) Allawah station Lifts
Prev by thread: Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
Next by thread: Re: [NSW] Five (in a car) thought dead after train crash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread