[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SCT Traffic

Subject: Re: SCT Traffic
From: Tell <just@hate.spammers.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:05:29 +0930
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: From Home
References: <3A5C2A38.79999EE7@hermes.net.au> <3a5d319d.25858188@can-news.tpg.com.au> <hha06tclq2oqpqqqgk58gbdtbfi0spckoa@4ax.com> <Wy886.14$BN4.2771@news0.optus.net.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28706

I did not know QR tried that, when was this.?

When AN began auxiliary fuel tanker trials, there was
some concern from crews re the increased "fire risks"
in a bad prang, an extra xx-thousand litres of fuel
sitting between two locos is worth thinking about.!

....Tell

>dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage) wrote:
> 
> Didn't QR also try this? I have a photo of a 1720 at Toowoomba with
> auxiliary fuel hoses on each end.
> 
> Cheers
> David

References:
- SCT Traffic
  - From: David & Julie Donald <dsjmd@hermes.net.au>
- Re: SCT Traffic
  - From: mauried@tpg.com.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: SCT Traffic
  - From: Tell <just@hate.spammers.com>
- Re: SCT Traffic
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

Prev by Date: Re: Regents Park / Potts Hill Branch Line
Next by Date: Re: SCT Traffic
Prev by thread: Re: SCT Traffic
Next by thread: Re: SCT Traffic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread