[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)

Subject: Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
From: amorton@mudguard.ee.mu.oz.au (Anthony Morton)
Date: 6 Apr 2001 03:34:00 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Dept. of Elec. Eng, University of Melbourne
References: <9acdrm$2i61$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au> <3ACD2684.EB109403@iprimus.com.au> <pT9z6.128577$lj4.3916778@news6.giganews.com> <3ACD2EE2.15D4CCC4@iprimus.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34369

Peter  <railvic@iprimus.com.au> wrote:

>And, if they electrify Frankston-Stony Point line, they could also
>divide at Frankston and have one set continue to Stony Point while other
>set stays at Frankston.

Or goes to Mornington (OK, Tanti Park).....

TM

References:
- Connex train splitting
  - From: "Paul Hambleton" <phambletonREMOVE@labyrinth.net.au>
- Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
  - From: Peter <railvic@iprimus.com.au>
- Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
  - From: Peter <railvic@iprimus.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Roll Call
Next by Date: Re: Roll Call
Prev by thread: Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
Next by thread: Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread