[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)

Subject: Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
From: Peter <railvic@iprimus.com.au>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 12:14:28 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@cwo.net.au
References: <9acdrm$2i61$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au> <01c0bcd5$476aa040$ac8417d2@rodsmith> <HSRy6.4690$Xi1.39738@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3acd1aae$0$25514$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <1d9z6.128547$lj4.3913705@news6.giganews.com>
Reply-To: railvic@iprimus.com.au
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34361

Dave Proctor wrote:

[snip]
 
> Seems to me that it is not happening with Connex because they do not want it
> to happen, rather than it being technically or legally impossible.
> 
> Dave

I don't think M>Trains (Bayside) does this either ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Connex train splitting
  - From: "Paul Hambleton" <phambletonREMOVE@labyrinth.net.au>
- Re: Connex train splitting
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: Connex train splitting
  - From: "Sam Eades" <seades@bigpond.net.au>
- Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
  - From: "Michael Wierzbinski" <wizzer1865@NOSPAMoptusnet.com.au>
- Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Your Website
Next by Date: Re: [MELB] City Loop issues
Prev by thread: Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
Next by thread: Re: Splitting trains (was Connex train splitting)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread