[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cityrail don't need guards

Subject: Re: Cityrail don't need guards
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 23:49:54 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <dX9M5.16304$e5.38932@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3a09d691$0$19413$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <qNkO5.82171$YX4.2566229@news2.giganews.com> <3a09df2b$0$19418$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <HTlO5.82651$YX4.2571114@news2.giganews.com> <8FE777D72gunzelT333@139.130.239.94> <3a09f661$0$19417$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a0a6ac5$0$19415$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a0ab77a$0$19417$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8ufets$2hdi$1@pc1762.alcatel.com.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:24058

thebaron@nospam.ozemail.com.au wrote:

> I think your worried about nothing. Theres no way you can get rid of
> guards in sydney it just wouldn't come close to being safe. All it
> takes is one look especially at peak times.

Smashed window in the 2nd car...  Lock up the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th
cars. :-)

--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

References:
- [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
  - From: "David Lindstrom" <D_Lindstrom@Bigpond.com>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "sean" <sean@hello.springwood.rail>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "B." <gunzel412@dingoblue.gunzel.net.au>
- Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Safety first in rail system's radical revamp
Next by Date: Re: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image
Prev by thread: Re: Cityrail don't need guards
Next by thread: Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread