[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett

Subject: Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
From: Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:45:57 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: University of Queensland
References: <018ed270.5f000f2a@usw-ex0102-013.remarq.com> <3882A8EB.1DD74EA4@mailbox.uq.edu.au> <85u9i2$ced$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> <3882AC05.A4A373A3@mailbox.uq.edu.au> <3882B798.D4305C19@ozemail.com.au>

James Brook wrote:

> > Semi-seriously, why not reguage an R? There may be economies of scale
> > and whatnot in sticking to what they know.

> They need R711 and R766 for the Warrnambool service and it is unlikely that this
> line will be regauged in the near future. After R700 is rebuilt, the only R left
> would be 707's R753.

Ah - I was under the impression there were more R's lurking on plinths
in parks and suchlike.

> - James Brook -

-- 
Robert Kearey		Remote Access Group
ITS			University of Queensland
My poor Krell!		I don't speak for my employer

Follow-Ups:
- Surviving R classes (was: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett)
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>

References:
- West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
  - From: darin <darin.o'brienNOdaSPAM@dhs.vic.gov.au.invalid>
- Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
  - From: Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
- Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
  - From: "Stuart Thyer" <s.thyer@anatomy.unimelb.edu.au>
- Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
  - From: Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
- Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: R700 and 3 T's to Ballarat 30/1/00
Next by Date: Re: [VIC] When are the new trams coming
Prev by thread: Re: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
Next by thread: Surviving R classes (was: West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread