Re: Connex

[Railvic <railvic@primus.com.au>]

Ian Jelf wrote:
> 
> In article <3A4E770F.CD73F15B@primus.com.au>, Railvic
> <railvic@primus.com.au> writes
> >Dear all,
> >
> >Correct me, if I'm wrong, but the rolling stock used by Connex in
> >England are leased from another company?  If this is correct, then it is
> >no wonder that that carriages are old.
> IT IS CORRECT.   In the UK there as ROSCOs (Rolling Stock companies0 who
> own the rolling stock) and lease it to the TOCs (Train operating
> companies).
> 
> However, this was done with the specific intention securing better
> rolling stock!   The logic goes:  if a TOC owns the rolling stock it
> won't invest in new rolling stock in case it loses its franchise (in
> which case it might be worthless to it).   I'm not saying this is right
> (and I certainly don't want to come across as someone out to defend the
> British way of doing things on this matter) but it wasn't some sort of
> "oversight" in the privatisation process:  it was done with good
> intentions.
> 
> >Whereas in Melbourne, Connex owns the carriages and will
> >introduce new ones from 2002.
> So what safeguard did the Victorian government build in (and I'm sure
> they did) to prevent a TOC nearing the end of its franchise neglecting
> rolling stock?

Unfortunately I don't know all the ins and outs of Melbourne public
transport franchising agreement, but I believe the operators have
specified during their bidding process time frame and number of new
rolling stock they will introduced during the contract period.  Connex
has already introduced its refurbished Comeng 6-car sets and there are 5
sets doing revenue runs during weekdays.
 
[snip]

Railvic