[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tangaras are crap

Subject: Re: Tangaras are crap
From: "Eric Cartman" <erkemail@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 16:47:05 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct
References: <B44C8FCB.4E9%joel@abilitycorp.com.au> <80snj2$1kn1@xlprod01.westpac.com.au> <8llY3.21276$we.35176@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <80vafd$su1$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <4sJY3.4461$MZ.36043@ozemail.com.au> <3833ba95@vk4lw.caboolture.net.au> <01bab708$078e5620$660665cb@tom-boles>

SMU = suburban multiple unit

Eric
www.erk.au.com
My website has lots of SMU's, EMU's (Elctric Multiple Units) and IMU's
(Interurban Multiple Units) - QR's classification, not mine. Technically, if
an electric train has a cab at either end, it is an EMU.

Jonathan Boles wrote in message <01bab708$078e5620$660665cb@tom-boles>...
>Excuse my ignorance, but what is an SMU?
>
>> debatable.. i think QR's new 220series SMUs look much sexier :)
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Notagunzel" <notagunzel@bigfoot.com>

References:
- Tangaras
  - From: Joel Cooper <joel@abilitycorp.com.au>
- Tangaras are crap
  - From: "David" <drhilder@hotmail.com (nospamjunk)>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Dean Stalker" <dstalker2000@hotmail.com>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Garry Hoddinett" <hoddos@netspace.net.au>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Thomas Fothergill" <s370507@student.uq.edu.au>
- Re: Tangaras are crap
  - From: "Jonathan Boles" <mousewithglasses@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Martin Place Indicators
Next by Date: Penrith @ 0420 (was Tangaras are crap)
Prev by thread: Re:[Qld] Year MMIX (was, OT, Tangaras are crap)
Next by thread: Re: Tangaras are crap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread