[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Melbourne Double deckers

Subject: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 17:03:16 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <381FFDD9.114D5E93@primus.com.au> <38200c68$0$6807@motown.iinet.net.au> <38202EAF.B46C9334@ozemail.com.au> <7vpdhp$9sc$1@news1.mpx.com.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

Dave Proctor wrote:

> David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> 38202EAF.B46C9334@ozemail.com.au">news:38202EAF.B46C9334@ozemail.com.au...
>
> > >  Re double deckers for Melbourne, I couldn't agree more
> > > except they are slow for boarding and alighting making for long journey
> > > times!!!
> >
> > Not that much different.  A 3 car Comeng has 9 sets of doors.  A 4D has 8
> sets
> > of doors.
>
> So there are less doors for more people - sounds like slower to me.

No, less doors for the same number of people.


--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

References:
- Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: Richard <richard_snook@primus.com.au>
- Re: Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: "Graeme" <gvrail@thatsent.com.au>
- Re: Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [VIC] Route 59 tram website
Next by Date: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Prev by thread: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Next by thread: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread