[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Melbourne Double deckers

Subject: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 23:46:40 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <381FFDD9.114D5E93@primus.com.au> <38200c68$0$6807@motown.iinet.net.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

Graeme wrote:

> If you want all those things in an urban rail system, why not have a look at
> Perth.  It's clean, punctual, user friendly vastly more frequent than even
> much larger systems.

And carries how many passengers?

>  Re double deckers for Melbourne, I couldn't agree more
> except they are slow for boarding and alighting making for long journey
> times!!!

Not that much different.  A 3 car Comeng has 9 sets of doors.  A 4D has 8 sets
of doors.


--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: Michael <mk@netstra.com.au>
- Re: Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>

References:
- Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: Richard <richard_snook@primus.com.au>
- Re: Melbourne Double deckers
  - From: "Graeme" <gvrail@thatsent.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Vic Train Guards.
Next by Date: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Prev by thread: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Next by thread: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread