[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vic Train Guards.

Subject: Re: Vic Train Guards.
From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@#DELETE#custard.net.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 23:49:23 +1100
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <381FAFD8.F8865466@fastlink.com.au> <8E73AE6F9telstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net>

Michael <mk@netstra.com.au> wrote in message
8E73AE6F9telstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net">news:8E73AE6F9telstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net...
> Sounds like a load of bs to me. Possibly confused with putting the
> obligatory 100 conductors back on trams,

Yeah.. 100 conductors. Terrific. With, what, five or six hundred trams on
the road up to 20 hours a day, where are they going to put 100 conductors?!?


Daniel

--
Daniel Bowen, Melbourne, Australia
dbowen at custard dot net dot au

References:
- Vic Train Guards.
  - From: Railway Rasputin <bob@fastlink.com.au>
- Re: Vic Train Guards.
  - From: Michael <mk@netstra.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Next by Date: Re: Melbourne Double deckers
Prev by thread: Re: Vic Train Guards.
Next by thread: Re: Vic Train Guards.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread