[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NG v SG

In article <01be78ad$fcba5da0$8e1b1acb@osborne>,
  "rod gayford" <rodjg@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
<snip>
> once you start running real
> trains you run into all sorts of problems and the supposed economies
> associated with the original reason for going NG evaporate and you end up
> with a sub-standard railroad that costs as much as a standard gauge one
> without the benefits of SG. <snip>

On a completely subjective and non-technical note, don't you think that
narrow guage is a lot more *fun* than standard guage? There's just something
very enjoyable about riding on a NG train, charging around seemingly tighter
corners, with the characteristic hunting and swaying as it bounces merrily
along!

>
> Cheers
>
> RJG


Rob

Sydney (Australia)

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own