[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Sydney underground station

Subject: Re: New Sydney underground station
From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:31:27 +0800
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <MeHG2.6$tb.348417@news0.optus.net.au> <36EBA57F.2C01A522@ozemail.com.au> <7cqle6$hdi$1@the-fly.zip.com.au> <7ct7s6$eam$1@news.tmx.com.au> <36f7294b.0@news.highway1.com.au> <d6zK2.41202$Hn5.24152@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
Reply-To: "David & Jan Winter" <winterdspamtrap@nospam-icenet.com.au>

Oops - I do stand corrected - of course, those lines are now officially OOS.
DW

Ron BEST wrote in message ...
>
>David & Jan Winter wrote in message <36f7294b.0@news.highway1.com.au>...
>>To join the ranks of pedantic posters, perhaps "unused" would be a better
>>description than "disused" - see below - DW
>
>
>Not entirely true - part of the tunnels immediately  north of St James were
>occupied until relatively recently by the two terminating tracks.

References:
- New Sydney underground station
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: New Sydney underground station
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: New Sydney underground station
  - From: "Peter Nelsson" <pnelsson@wr.com.au>
- Re: New Sydney underground station
  - From: "Trevor Edmonds" <tedmonds@tmx.com.au>
- Re: New Sydney underground station
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
- Re: New Sydney underground station
  - From: "Ron BEST" <ronbest@bigpond.com>

Prev by Date: Re: A HOARY OLD QUESTION
Next by Date: Branch Line unclosings (cf re-openings)
Prev by thread: Re: New Sydney underground station
Next by thread: Re: New Sydney underground station
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread