[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard

Subject: Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
From: "Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 18:15:51 +1100
Approved: thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Optus Internet
References: <839s7k$5q3$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <386722D6.EC08728C@idx.com.au> <pkT94.57$gj1.5696@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <38689B31.8923E589@ozemail.com.au> <84a6bq$p2g$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <OJha4.257$Pw1.12113@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <84ccbp$b7n$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <386af7f0@pink.one.net.au>

Vanguard wrote in message <386af7f0@pink.one.net.au>...
>
>>
>> There are provisions in the Act to cover exemptions, and they are granted
>> regularly, when it can be shown that there has been previous
>discrimination
>> and action needs to be taken to redress that.
>
>
>They must have some very good crap artists as there has never been
>discrimination against females. There has never been anything stopping
>females becoming Guards in the past.

Apart from mysoginy (sp?).

Dave

References:
- [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: Bob Horgan <rhorgan@idx.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: "Russell Norton" <russelln@primus.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: "Russell Norton" <russelln@primus.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
  - From: "Vanguard" <apri@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
Next by Date: Re: Don River Railway
Prev by thread: Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
Next by thread: Re: [NSW] CityRail Guard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread