Re: Rod "speaks" again. was > Re: SAW/ASW - was Re: Computer Question - DTC

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>]

Rod wrote in message <837vp3$3uo$1@news1.mpx.com.au>...
>
>> Still waiting for you to back up your statement that Craig Dewick would
be
>> open to legal action for publishing his pay details.
>>
>> Dave
>Thank you Dave, and I added that I was waiting for full details to be
>published about your pay, and any other details you might wish Craig to
>publish on your behalf??

And as I said, what I publish is my business, what Craig publishes is his.
Craig chose to publish his pay details, you came back and said he was
legally liable to do so. So back it up.

I have chosen not to publish my pay details. That does not absolve you from
backing up your claim that it was unlawful for Craig to publish his details.

>What's the use of legal action , if you cannot
>afford the Courts, anyway, don't put words in my mouth, I can do that
>without your help.

I did not put words in your mouth - you did that just fine without my help.

>One of the few Solicitors that I have had reason to
>appreciate, mailed me privately, with advice that the Union may have some
>concern, and grounds for litigation, with a member divulging information,
>that directly breached the privacy of its members.

And why don't I believe you? Probably because the information that was
divulged is freely available anyway, and I could have obtained it *if* I had
bothered to go to the Industrial Commission.

>Rod

Not related to Rod Speed by any chance?

>Confidentiality clauses are part of life, friend!

"You ain't actually established that such a clause was applicable in this
case".

>Try to find out if the person you are waiting for is on board that plane
>that you have spent an hour waiting at the airport for.

And they have a particular duty of care to the passenger in those cases -
nothing like what you are quoting here.

>So for those that are interested, Dave, I expect to hear all the details of
>your wage contract by return post???

Nope - it is irrelevant to the current debate. The current debate concerns
the right of a worker to disclose their wages if they choose to do so. My
wages have nothing to do with that. Craig chose to disclose his. I choose
not to do so.

>should also disclose full details of their own work contracts also, or just
>shut up

Take your own medicine.