Re: conditions as train operators

["Lineman" <grime@dcsi.net.au>]

"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.umpires.com> wrote in message
82kngr$hht$2@news1.mpx.com.au">news:82kngr$hht$2@news1.mpx.com.au...
> Roy Wilke wrote in message <384ddad5.43463589@news.bit.net.au>...
> >On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 22:24:20 +1100, "Rod" <comtrain@mpx.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >(snip)
> >
> >>You have no right to broadcast wage rates to all and sundry, in fact I
> hear
> >
> >He didn't. He elected to tell the fellow what he *personally* was
> >paid. Anyway, one of the first questions anyone asks when enquiring
> >about a job is "what's the wage like?" and they're generally told that
> >it's "about $xx per hour", "$xxx per week" or "around $xx,xxx per
> >year."
> >
> >Take a look in the employment advertisements one day in the paper -
> >you'll find that the approximate wages for a wide variety of jobs are
> >publicised there.
> >
> >However, Rod, if I were to find out without your permission what you
> >are personally paid per hour/week/year/decade, and into which bank
> >account that money was paid, then told sundry and all that
> >information, then you might be able to take legal action against me.
> >
> >But, somehow, I doubt it. Look at last week's news, and the set-up
> >between Packer and Acxiom which will make available personal
> >residential and financial details on about 15 million Australians
> >without their knowledge or consent. There's no law against that.
>
> Rod has been remarkably silent since he made his claim of illegality,
hasn't
> he?
>
> Dave
He could be off driving trains and trying to earn a living.
Graeme
>
>