Re: conditions as train operators

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>]

Lineman wrote in message <384df287@nap-ns1>...
>
>"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.umpires.com> wrote in message
>82kngr$hht$2@news1.mpx.com.au">news:82kngr$hht$2@news1.mpx.com.au...
>> Roy Wilke wrote in message <384ddad5.43463589@news.bit.net.au>...
>> >On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 22:24:20 +1100, "Rod" <comtrain@mpx.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >(snip)
>> >
>> >>You have no right to broadcast wage rates to all and sundry, in fact I
>> hear
>> >
>> >He didn't. He elected to tell the fellow what he *personally* was
>> >paid. Anyway, one of the first questions anyone asks when enquiring
>> >about a job is "what's the wage like?" and they're generally told that
>> >it's "about $xx per hour", "$xxx per week" or "around $xx,xxx per
>> >year."
>> >
>> >Take a look in the employment advertisements one day in the paper -
>> >you'll find that the approximate wages for a wide variety of jobs are
>> >publicised there.
>> >
>> >However, Rod, if I were to find out without your permission what you
>> >are personally paid per hour/week/year/decade, and into which bank
>> >account that money was paid, then told sundry and all that
>> >information, then you might be able to take legal action against me.
>> >
>> >But, somehow, I doubt it. Look at last week's news, and the set-up
>> >between Packer and Acxiom which will make available personal
>> >residential and financial details on about 15 million Australians
>> >without their knowledge or consent. There's no law against that.
>>
>> Rod has been remarkably silent since he made his claim of illegality,
>hasn't
>> he?
>>
>> Dave
>He could be off driving trains and trying to earn a living.

That was over 48 hours ago.

Dave