[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Oakleigh

Subject: Re: Oakleigh
From: Craig Haber <albatross@harnessnet.com.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:22:45 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Harness-Net
References: <7piuqj$8m2$2@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <37C001F4.EEF1C236@ancc.com.au> <37C13E27.DA6539C0@harnessnet.com.au> <37C14EF0.5EF24B12@ancc.com.au> <37C28957.79A168DF@harnessnet.com.au> <37C28ECB.4AF6D2FD@ancc.com.au>

G'day,

David Langley wrote:

> I have a copy of the 1988 diagram and it is correct to the track layout. Have they drawn
> a new diagram (and I don't know why they would) since the crossover was renewed in recent
> times? You didn't note the drawing date by any chance. I'll send you a copy of my 1988
> diagram (by separate email) and you can tell me if that seems to be the one that you saw.

It's newer than that - no I didn't note the date, but I think it was renewed when the disc
was installed.  I'll ask next time I'm there.

Cheers,
CH.
--
Craig Haber
albatross@harnessnet.com.au
http://www.harnessnet.com.au/ch/
Proofread carefully to see if you any words out

References:
- Oakleigh
  - From: cmgord@ecr.mu.oz.au (Christopher_Martin GORDON)
- Re: Oakleigh
  - From: David Langley <del@ancc.com.au>
- Re: Oakleigh
  - From: Craig Haber <albatross@harnessnet.com.au>
- Re: Oakleigh
  - From: David Langley <del@ancc.com.au>
- Re: Oakleigh
  - From: Craig Haber <albatross@harnessnet.com.au>
- Re: Oakleigh
  - From: David Langley <del@ancc.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Cleaning Ballast - Why do they need to do this?
Next by Date: Rail Images Australia Website
Prev by thread: Re: Oakleigh
Next by thread: Re: Oakleigh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread