[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QR and photographers
Roy Wilke <3891@bit.net.au> wrote in message <37a7cdd2@news.ausmail.com>...
>It's a different level of government and a different aspect of government.
>I'm not going to go into detail about how the ATO work, but simply it is on
>precedent - if an ATO decision is successfully challenged through the AAT
or
>the courts, then that creates a new precedent for the ATO to work on.
>Somehow, I can't see any railway operator running a system on that basis.
>
>If you're so keen to go and find where the legislative basis is for Railway
>By-Laws, then I suggest you go and look it up and let us all know what you
>find. A good starting place might be the "Railways Act."
I am not the one making the assertion that QR have the right. All I am
saying is that those who claim they DO have the right should provide some
proof. Proof is NOT a phone call to the SM's office.
DaveP