[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not just the TGV?

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Why not just the TGV?
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:58:15 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <6ogslj$md9@inferno.mpx.com.au> <revdoc-1507981352420001@bastardo.its.uow.edu.au> <6oi48o$fl3$2@news.mel.aone.net.au> <6oi5gf$nqi$1@news.mel.aone.net.au> <6oideh$pit$1@the-fly.zip.com.au> <6oieqp$9is$1@news.mel.aone.net.au> <6oijrm$sn8$1@the-fly.zip.com.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

Wollongong Quokka wrote:

> There's certainly been a plan floating around somewhere for a tunnel from
> Waterfall to Thirroul, but I don't think it's ever been considered very
> seriously and I have no idea if it even deserves to be.  It certainly would
> make a big difference to the Sydney - Wollongong run though.

I guess they'll wait until the Stanwell Creek viaduct falls into the valley.

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: markbau1@aol.com (MarkBau1)
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Paul Jones" <dj_argon@geocities.com>

References:
- Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Tanner" <tanner@mpx.com.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: revdoc@uow.edu.au (Phil Herring)
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: dbromage@omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Barry Campbell" <campblbm@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Wollongong Quokka" <quokka@zip.net.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Barry Campbell" <campblbm@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Wollongong Quokka" <quokka@zip.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Rail Black Spots
Next by Date: Re: West Coast Railway
Prev by thread: Re: Why not just the TGV?
Next by thread: Re: Why not just the TGV?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread