[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not just the TGV?

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Why not just the TGV?
From: markbau1@aol.com (MarkBau1)
Date: 16 Jul 1998 21:56:41 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: <35AD5E36.7B4984A3@ozemail.com.au>

<<<<<<I guess they'll wait until the Stanwell Creek viaduct falls into the
valley.>>>>>>

You mean it hasn't yet? Last time I went over it was in the cab of a 422 with
depowered Budds behind in about 1988 and it had a 10KPH? restriction and looked
to my untrained eye to be in terrible shape!

Mark.


I can be abused and called names at: markbau@aol.com

If the abuse is particularly profound I'll give you my real email address.

References:
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Melbourne - Metcard validation before every trip
Next by Date: Re: British Rail privatisation a disaster
Prev by thread: Re: Why not just the TGV?
Next by thread: Re: Why not just the TGV?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread