Re: Airport link impressions

["Dave Proctor" <david@sd3.mailbank.com>]

"Maurie Daly" <mauried@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
3af9dae7.2022809@can-news.tpg.com.au">news:3af9dae7.2022809@can-news.tpg.com.au...
> On Wed, 9 May 2001 21:10:39 +1000, "Chris Downs"
> <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dion Williams <onamission@today.com.au> wrote in message
> >3AF903EF.46D0@today.com.au">news:3AF903EF.46D0@today.com.au...
> >> Dave Proctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Brisbane has better trains, and is faced with the advantage that the
> >service
> >> > is not part of an existing line - so when you board at Domestic, the
train
> >> > is empty, and at International there will only be a few passengers
already
> >> > on board. This is a huge advantage for those with a lot of luggage,
> >compared
>
> I would have though that as the Brisbane Airport line is also
> privately financed the last thing the owners would want is only a few
> passengers getting on the trains at the Airport.

You knew what I meant - neither airport station is faced with a train
arriving and it being already packed.

Dave