Re: grat barier reef dying, silted and over fertilised and suffering from occasional fevers

["Stu de Baker" <Stu@bakers.shop>]

What's the matter, TurdBoy??   You told us you were leaving us but you're
still here!!    Please don't hang around any longer than you feel you must!

~~ jp turcaud ~~ <henri.airaud@poglio.com> wrote in message
9fp257$ltf$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net">news:9fp257$ltf$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net...
> Comment in your text Mr Strawman or Wicker man !
>
> Indeed I may find your bitter compliments, somehow understandable, by the
> propensity of some to smear others with qualities which are their own !
>
> Didn't you know ? Well you know now !
>
> In due course your above compliments are returned to you Sir !
> I have no use for them at the present time !!! Thank you !
>
> --
> Jean-Paul Turcaud
> Hydro & Mining Prospector
> Pioneer of Australian Mining
> Web Sites:
> The Greatest Australian Mining Covered up Swindle Of The 20th Century
> www.poglio.com/welleda
> Refutation Of The Horrid Geological Myths
> www.poglio.com/horus1st
>
> ~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven~~
>
>
> "Tim Scrivens" <tim.scrivens@nz.eds.com> wrote in message
> 9fop7d$qlm$1@hermes.nz.eds.com">news:9fop7d$qlm$1@hermes.nz.eds.com...
> >
> > "~~ jp turcaud ~~" <henri.airaud@poglio.com> wrote in message
> > 9fnui5$807$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net">news:9fnui5$807$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net...
> > > Don't be such a snob Tim !
> > >
> > > Both spelling exist of course ... without considering naturally the
same
> > > concept in different alphabet like the Cyrillic,  Greek , Chinese,
> > Armenian
> > > etc
> >
> > And are we speaking any of those?  Strawman, or wicker man argument.
> >
> > Normal spelling, in English, is as I put it.  I realise clarity is not
one
> > of your strengths, but perhaps you should concentrate on it.  There is
> > nothing snobbish about being clear.
>
>
> §§§ Of course not; snobbery does not lie in the fact of being clear; it
lies
> in the fact of being attached to the form and not to the content !
> You wrote indeed
> QUOTE
> ...  Amourabi ....  He means Hammurabi, and he is (as usual) wrong about
> what they (the laws) mean.
> UNQUOTE
>
> Knowing that I have in my Encyclopedia Hammourabi, king of Babylone in
1765
> BC etc... you must admit I was not too far off the mark since I quoted
from
> memory ! Further I am not in a position to control you own spelling as
> correct !
>
> In 1901 a diorite stele was found on which reported Jurispudence cases
where
> used  by judges in court as legal precedent ... this is what incidently
is
> used in the US and called " Case Law " and which indeed the basis of
Justice
> rendering ... same exists in Grande Bretagne too !
>
> As a result it can be quite proper to refer to the Hammourabi Laws,  since
> what is called now the Hammourabi Code was seen as the basis of Law then
>
> As a result to be branded nasty names  on this basis,  is what I am
calling
> being a snob on your part ... further I note " as usual wrong " which is a
> typical comment of someone excessivelly snobbish person indeed ...
> infatuated of him or herself !
>
> Finally, you have not express yourself at all on the content of the
> Hammourabi Code ...  In my book it's very close to Celtic Law and I
maintain
> my position on this !
> Good Bye !
>  §§§
>
>
>
> "snip"
>
>
>