[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard

Subject: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:25:55 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Gunzel
References: <p.edwards-ya023580001503010917560001@news.unimelb.edu.au> <3ab06bc4$0$25466$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <d5_r6.18050$E57.708601@news4.aus1.giganews.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/03.04.11
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:33476

daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au (Dave Proctor) wrote in
<d5_r6.18050$E57.708601@news4.aus1.giganews.com>: 

>You can insert a short trip x 10 ticket twice if there are two people
>travelling.

Bullshit.

-- 
To email me, just remove ".spam" or else your reply gets directed to the 
bit bucket.

Whip ME, Beat ME. "Windows ME".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au (Paul Edwards)
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Andy B (Temporary)" <laurelb@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Ruterord Branch
Next by Date: Re: Travel Guides (Slightly OT)
Prev by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Next by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread